AI-Driven Judicial Decision Support Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning, NLP, and Explainable AI for Legal Case Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62643/Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial decision-making is revolutionizing legal case resolution by enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and fairness. This research explores the development of an AI-driven judicial decision support system leveraging machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and explainable AI (XAI) to assist in case analysis, precedent identification, and predictive judgment. By training AI models on court rulings, statutory laws, and legal transcripts, the system aims to streamline judicial workflows, reduce case backlog, and minimize biases in legal outcomes. The study builds upon prior research demonstrating AI's ability to predict court decisions with up to 79% accuracy and its capability in legal text summarization and argument mining. It examines Bayesian network models for probabilistic legal reasoning, as well as the application of SHAP and LIME techniques to ensure transparency in AI-generated legal recommendations. Additionally, the study addresses ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias, legal accountability, and compliance with regulatory frameworks, ensuring AI's responsible deployment in the judiciary. By evaluating real-world AI implementations—such as the use of AI-powered risk assessment tools in U.S. courts and AI-assisted case resolution in European judicial systems—this research assesses AI’s potential in legal decision-making while identifying critical challenges in fairness, transparency, and explainability. The findings contribute to the advancement of hybrid AI-human decision models, reinforcing the need for legal oversight and ethical AI governance. Through extensive validation and case studies, this research provides a comprehensive framework for AI-assisted legal reasoning, ensuring that automation complements human discretion while upholding judicial integrity and public trust.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.













